Skip to main content

Memcached bulk api (spymemcached v/s memcached-client)

We use memcached as a cache to front mysql and we do caching at granular level. As we are a cloud filesystem company,  we cache files by path and folders by path. The problems comes when someone renames a top level folder that has 100K or more files in the hierarchy. The db operation is fast because in db all we need to do is one folder update (files are stored in normalized fashion so no rename is required at file level in db) but rename in memcache means add/delete of 100K keys. So that's like 200K operations and production code was spending close to 2 mins in memcache only. We use memcached-client java library in our code.  Memcache protocol doesn't support bulk-api so there was no easy solution than trying to set it in different threads but one colleague came across this interesting optimization that spymemcached guys has done spymemcached write optimizations.

I thought of writing a test program to compare memcached-client v/s spymemcached and spymemcached rocks.

1. On my local laptop(connected to a local memcache)  100K add is 2 sec and 100K delete is 800 msec using spymemcached whereas it took 8 sec for 100K add and 6 sec for 100K deletes using memcached-client.
1. Connecting to a remote memcache and doing 100K adds took 6 sec using spymemcached and 40 sec using memcached-client.

Here are my Test programs
=============SpyMemcached================
import java.net.InetSocketAddress;
import net.spy.memcached.MemcachedClient;
import java.io.*;
public class TestSpyMemcached {
    public static void main(String[] args) throws IOException {
        String msg="{\"name\":\"test\",\"cName\":\"test\",\"cPath\":\"/shared/marketing/engineering/test\",\"path\":\"/Shared/marketing/Engineering/test\",\"folderId\":\"c08a0d93-8216-4262-b8ec-f1f24c9f9844\",\"parentId\":\"7d9e6fbc-9d0d-4bf8-90e3-aaa924df0777\",\"ctime\":1340051093864}";
    MemcachedClient c=new MemcachedClient(
            new InetSocketAddress(args[0], Integer.parseInt(args[1])));
        long start = System.currentTimeMillis();       
        for(int i=0;i<100000;i++) {
            c.set("key"+i, 3600, msg+i);
            if(i%1000==0) {
               System.out.println("added " + i + " objects");
            }   
        }
        System.out.println(System.currentTimeMillis()-start);
        start = System.currentTimeMillis();       
        for(int i=0;i<100000;i++) {
            c.delete("key"+i);
            if(i%1000==0) {
               System.out.println("deleted " + i + " objects");
            }   
        }
        System.out.println(System.currentTimeMillis()-start);
        c.shutdown();
    }
}

=============Memcached-client================
import java.net.InetSocketAddress;
import com.meetup.memcached.MemcachedClient;
import com.meetup.memcached.SockIOPool;
import java.io.*;
public class TestMemcachedClient {
    public static void main(String[] args) throws IOException {
        String msg="{\"name\":\"test\",\"cName\":\"test\",\"cPath\":\"/shared/marketing/engineering/test\",\"path\":\"/Shared/marketing/Engineering/test\",\"folderId\":\"c08a0d93-8216-4262-b8ec-f1f24c9f9844\",\"parentId\":\"7d9e6fbc-9d0d-4bf8-90e3-aaa924df0777\",\"ctime\":1340051093864}";

        SockIOPool pool = SockIOPool.getInstance();
        String[] memcacheServers = new String[]{args[0] + ":" + args[1]};
        pool.setServers(memcacheServers);
        pool.setHashingAlg(SockIOPool.NEW_COMPAT_HASH);
        pool.initialize();
        MemcachedClient mclient = new MemcachedClient();
            mclient.setSanitizeKeys(false);
            mclient.setCompressEnable(false);
        mclient.setPrimitiveAsString(true);
        long start = System.currentTimeMillis();       
        for(int i=0;i<100000;i++) {
            mclient.set("key"+i, msg+i, 3600);
            if(i%1000==0) {
               System.out.println("added " + i + " objects");
            }   
        }
        System.out.println(System.currentTimeMillis()-start);
        start = System.currentTimeMillis();       
        for(int i=0;i<100000;i++) {
            mclient.delete("key"+i);
            if(i%1000==0) {
               System.out.println("deleted " + i + " objects");
            }   
        }
        System.out.println(System.currentTimeMillis()-start);
    }
}

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

RabbitMQ java clients for beginners

Here is a sample of a consumer and producer example for RabbitMQ. The steps are
Download ErlangDownload Rabbit MQ ServerDownload Rabbit MQ Java client jarsCompile and run the below two class and you are done.
This sample create a Durable Exchange, Queue and a Message. You will have to start the consumer first before you start the for the first time.

For more information on AMQP, Exchanges, Queues, read this excellent tutorial
http://blogs.digitar.com/jjww/2009/01/rabbits-and-warrens/

+++++++++++++++++RabbitMQProducer.java+++++++++++++++++++++++++++
import com.rabbitmq.client.Connection; import com.rabbitmq.client.Channel; import com.rabbitmq.client.*; public class RabbitMQProducer { public static void main(String []args) throws Exception { ConnectionFactory factory = new ConnectionFactory(); factory.setUsername("guest"); factory.setPassword("guest"); factory.setVirtualHost("/"); factory.setHost("127.0.0.1"); factory.setPort(5672); Conne…

Spring query timeout or transaction timeout

If you are using spring to manage transactions then you can specify default transaction timeout using

    <bean id="transactionManager"
        class="org.springframework.jdbc.datasource.DataSourceTransactionManager">
        <property name="dataSource" ref="dataSource" />
        <property name="defaultTimeout" value="30" /> <!--30 sec--->             
    </bean>

or you can override the timeout in the annotation

    @Transactional(readOnly = false, timeout=30)


or if you are doing it programatic transactions then you can do


DataSourceTransactionManager transactionManager = new DataSourceTransactionManager(dataSource);
transactionManager.setDefaultTimeout(30);

 or you can override the timeout for one particular transaction

TransactionTemplate transactionTemplate = new TransactionTemplate();
transactionTemplate.setTimeout(30);

Python adding pid file

I have a thumbnail generator that launches multiple processes and the correct way to shut it down is to send kill -HUP to the parent process. To automate I had to write a pid file from python, it was a piece of cake
def writePidFile(): pid = str(os.getpid()) f = open('thumbnail_rabbit_consumer.pid', 'w') f.write(pid) f.close()