Skip to main content

Java code coverage using cobertura

Code coverage is important as it gives developers confidence in the code that they are checking in. And for a startup automated test and measuring code coverage is equally important to be able to Ship early and be nimble.  I recently automated unit testing in jenkins and wanted to measure how much code coverage we have. So I integrated cobertura in the build framework. Cobertura is a build time instrumentation plugin so the steps are:

1) compile the code
2) Instrument the classes to generate instrumented classes with cobertura hooks.
3) modify junit class path to put instrumented classes before real classes
4) add a system property in junit ant task, so that cobertura knows where to write its statistics.
5) generate a coverage report in html to be used by developers
6) generate a coverage report in xml so that it can be published to sonar so we can do trends on code coverage release after release.

Here is how a typical code coverage report looks like http://cobertura.sourceforge.net/sample/



Here are some more details on the steps:

    <target name="instrument" description="Run Tests">
        <delete file="${basedir}/cobertura.ser" />
        <delete dir="${basedir}/build/instrumented-classes" />
        <cobertura-instrument todir="${basedir}/build/instrumented-classes">
            <ignore regex="org.apache.log4j.*" />
            <fileset dir="${basedir}/build/classes">
                <include name="**/*.class" />
                <exclude name="**/*Test.class" />
            </fileset>
        </cobertura-instrument>
    </target>


        <junit tempdir="${basedir}/build" printsummary="on"
               fork="yes"
               forkmode="perBatch"
               haltonfailure="true"
               failureproperty="tests.failed"
               showoutput="false">
            <jvmarg value="-Djava.awt.headless=true"/>
              <jvmarg value="-Djava.io.tmpdir=${basedir}/build/jenkinstest"/>
            <jvmarg value="-Dnet.sourceforge.cobertura.datafile=${basedir}/cobertura.ser" />           
            <classpath location="build/instrumented-classes" />
            <classpath refid="${testClasspathRefId}"/>
            <classpath refid="cobertura.classpath" />
            <formatter type="plain" usefile="false"/>
            <batchtest todir="${basedir}/${testReportsDir}">
                <fileset dir="${basedir}/${build}/classes">
                    <include name="**/*${testClassPattern}.*"/>
                    <exclude name="**/*$*.*"/>
                </fileset>
                <formatter type="xml"/>           
            </batchtest>
        </junit>


    <target name="coverage">
        <delete file="build/cobertura.ser" quiet="true" />
        <delete dir="build/coverage"  quiet="true"/>

        <cobertura-merge datafile= "build/cobertura.ser">
            <fileset dir="${basedir}/">
              <include name="**/cobertura.ser"/>
            </fileset>
        </cobertura-merge>   
        <cobertura-report format="html" destdir="build/coverage" datafile= "build/cobertura.ser">
            <fileset dir="${basedir}" includes="**/*.java"/>
        </cobertura-report>   
        <cobertura-report format="xml" destdir="build/coverage" datafile= "build/cobertura.ser">
            <fileset dir="${basedir}" includes="**/*.java"/>
        </cobertura-report>
        <cobertura-check haltonfailure="false" />
    </target>


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Haproxy and tomcat JSESSIONID

One of the biggest problems I have been trying to solve at our startup is to put our tomcat nodes in HA mode. Right now if a customer comes, he lands on to a node and remains there forever. This has two major issues: 1) We have to overprovision each node with ability to handle worse case capacity. 2) If two or three high profile customers lands on to same node then we need to move them manually. 3) We need to cut over new nodes and we already have over 100+ nodes.  Its a pain managing these nodes and I waste lot of my time in chasing node specific issues. I loath when I know I have to chase this env issue. I really hate human intervention as if it were up to me I would just automate thing and just enjoy the fruits of automation and spend quality time on major issues rather than mundane task,call me lazy but thats a good quality. So Finally now I am at a stage where I can put nodes behing HAProxy in QA env. today we were testing the HA config and first problem I immediat...
Post a Comment
Read more

Adding Jitter to cache layer

Thundering herd is an issue common to webapp that rely on heavy caching where if lots of items expire at the same time due to a server restart or temporal event, then suddenly lots of calls will go to database at same time. This can even bring down the database in extreme cases. I wont go into much detail but the app need to do two things solve this issue. 1) Add consistent hashing to cache layer : This way when a memcache server is added/removed from the pool, entire cache is not invalidated.  We use memcahe from both python and Java layer and I still have to find a consistent caching solution that is portable across both languages. hash_ring and spymemcached both use different points for server so need to read/test more. 2) Add a jitter to cache or randomise the expiry time: We expire long term cache  records every 8 hours after that key was added and short term cache expiry is 2 hours. As our customers usually comes to work in morning and access the cloud file server it ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Spring 3.2 quartz 2.1 Jobs added with no trigger must be durable.

I am trying to enable HA on nodes and in that process I found that in a two test node setup a job that has a frequency of 10 sec was running into deadlock. So I tried upgrading from Quartz 1.8 to 2.1 by following the migration guide but I ran into an exception that says "Jobs added with no trigger must be durable.". After looking into spring and Quartz code I figured out that now Quartz is more strict and earlier the scheduler.addJob had a replace parameter which if passed to true would skip the durable check, in latest quartz this is fixed but spring hasnt caught up to this. So what do you do, well I jsut inherited the factory and set durability to true and use that public class DurableJobDetailFactoryBean extends JobDetailFactoryBean {     public DurableJobDetailFactoryBean() {         setDurability(true);     } } and used this instead of JobDetailFactoryBean in the spring bean definition     <bean i...
7 comments
Read more