Skip to main content

Velocity, code quality and manual QA

Unless you can remove manual QA, you can either have code quality or you can have release velocity. You cant have both goals, you need to compromise on one of them.

We recently did a big release where we replaced lot of old DWR apis with REST apis and we revamped a big part of old ExtJS UI with backbone based UI. The release was done in a duration of 4 weeks and even after delaying the release by 1 week, there were some bugs found by some customers.  I had expected some issues and I am of proponent of "fail fast and fix fast".  Many of these issues we were able to find and fix it on the weekend itself.

In the coming week we found an issue on Friday afternoon and we had a similar bug fixed for next release that would fix this bug also, but QA was unsure of merging this fix as most of the QA team was out. This is the second last week of december and it seems everyone is out for christmas so it was decided to delay the fix to be done when QA was available. Now I have to daily run some query to detect the bad data and run some cleanup scripts.

Doing this cleanup for last 2 days I realized this is BS and how can we break this dependency on human touch points. We have code coverage but only 45% line coverage and some 31% branch coverage.  It seems we have two conflicting goals "Velocity of feature releases" and "code quality".  We do one release every 2-3 weeks and until we can automate the hell out of code base to get close to 90%+ code coverage we would continue to run into this situation. We want to release every week or every day in future and unless we can eliminate human QA that goal seems far fetched.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Haproxy and tomcat JSESSIONID

One of the biggest problems I have been trying to solve at our startup is to put our tomcat nodes in HA mode. Right now if a customer comes, he lands on to a node and remains there forever. This has two major issues: 1) We have to overprovision each node with ability to handle worse case capacity. 2) If two or three high profile customers lands on to same node then we need to move them manually. 3) We need to cut over new nodes and we already have over 100+ nodes.  Its a pain managing these nodes and I waste lot of my time in chasing node specific issues. I loath when I know I have to chase this env issue. I really hate human intervention as if it were up to me I would just automate thing and just enjoy the fruits of automation and spend quality time on major issues rather than mundane task,call me lazy but thats a good quality. So Finally now I am at a stage where I can put nodes behing HAProxy in QA env. today we were testing the HA config and first problem I immediat...
Post a Comment
Read more

Adding Jitter to cache layer

Thundering herd is an issue common to webapp that rely on heavy caching where if lots of items expire at the same time due to a server restart or temporal event, then suddenly lots of calls will go to database at same time. This can even bring down the database in extreme cases. I wont go into much detail but the app need to do two things solve this issue. 1) Add consistent hashing to cache layer : This way when a memcache server is added/removed from the pool, entire cache is not invalidated.  We use memcahe from both python and Java layer and I still have to find a consistent caching solution that is portable across both languages. hash_ring and spymemcached both use different points for server so need to read/test more. 2) Add a jitter to cache or randomise the expiry time: We expire long term cache  records every 8 hours after that key was added and short term cache expiry is 2 hours. As our customers usually comes to work in morning and access the cloud file server it ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Spring 3.2 quartz 2.1 Jobs added with no trigger must be durable.

I am trying to enable HA on nodes and in that process I found that in a two test node setup a job that has a frequency of 10 sec was running into deadlock. So I tried upgrading from Quartz 1.8 to 2.1 by following the migration guide but I ran into an exception that says "Jobs added with no trigger must be durable.". After looking into spring and Quartz code I figured out that now Quartz is more strict and earlier the scheduler.addJob had a replace parameter which if passed to true would skip the durable check, in latest quartz this is fixed but spring hasnt caught up to this. So what do you do, well I jsut inherited the factory and set durability to true and use that public class DurableJobDetailFactoryBean extends JobDetailFactoryBean {     public DurableJobDetailFactoryBean() {         setDurability(true);     } } and used this instead of JobDetailFactoryBean in the spring bean definition     <bean i...
7 comments
Read more